by
Dorothy Rall, Michigan UNA
As we often say, apathy
toward public issues and world affairs is really the greatest enemy that
democracy faces. However, downright enmity toward one of our cherished
institutions warrants examination to seek what may trigger the fantasies of
fear. Alleged by some of these fear mongers is that the U.N. is taking over,
piece-by-piece, portions of valuable U.S. real estate -- even Yellowstone
National Park!
The factual germ upon
which this wild tale is built is undoubtedly the Convention Concerning the
Protection of the World Cultural and National Heritage adopted at the
General Conference of UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and
Cultural Organization) in Stockholm in 1972. (The U.S. was the first to
ratify this treaty-level convention.) The "World Heritage List," as of
December 1997, lists 552 properties: 418 cultural, 114 natural and 20 mixed
properties in 112 different nations. U.S. properties so listed number 18, of
which all but six are "natural" -- Yellowstone National Park included.
Nominations for the
World Heritage List must come from the country itself and must meet very
specific criteria, including a pledge from the home country to make every
effort to preserve the beauty or historical integrity of the property. Most
countries vie for the honor and recognition of having their favorite sites
designated for the list. International tourism is a frequent byproduct of
such designation -- which must partly explain why a number of major donors
to the World Heritage Fund are major hotel chains. The Fund may be tapped by
nations too poor to underwrite necessary maintenance work and in which the
entire world has an obvious interest. The current work on the Taj Mahal in
India, the Sphinx in Egypt, and Venice and its lagoon in Italy, serve as a
few obvious examples of why the world as a whole has a stake in the
maintenance of its treasures.
The world shows its
interest in Yellowstone National Park not only by having it listed
chronologically as its second (1978) U.S. honoree, but also by placing it on
the Heritage-in-Danger List in 1995 because of "over visitation by
tourists"! Clearly, even U.N. critics will concede that UNESCO can't close
our park, but their concern that we ration access in the interest of all may
be a wake-up call for preservation. We would hope that we wouldn't need the
interest of "the world" to prevent oil exploration in the crater of Old
Faithful!
Preserving World
Heritage sites was a project begun by UNESCO in 1960 in Egypt at Abu Simbel
when major monuments were cut, lifted, and reassembled on the high ground
before the area was submerged by waters of the Nile in the building of the
Aswan Dam. An exhibit of photographs of many of these projects adorned the
walls of the public lobby at the United Nations Headquarters in April and
May of 1998.
The U.S. withdrew from
UNESCO about 15 years ago to protest what it saw as mismanagement and some
alleged "managing the news." The agency now has a new Director-General,
Federico Mayor of Spain; and the President has recommended we rejoin (as the
United Kingdom did last summer).